Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Marcos Paulo Candeloro's avatar

Almost no one noticed — which, in this case, says more about the media than about politics: the mere speculation that Elon Musk might launch a new political movement in the U.S. has silently raised alarms behind the scenes of New York’s municipal contest. Not that Musk is a statesman — he’s more of a performative plutocrat with a digital Caesar complex — but the timing of the move reveals something bigger: the American party system, especially in the major progressive metropolises, has suffered a multi-organ failure.

In New York, the leading candidate in the Democratic primaries is Zohran Mamdani — an incendiary leftist activist of identity politics who honors Hamas leaders in teenage rap songs, advocates defunding the police in neighborhoods he himself doesn’t enter, and positions himself as a liberator. The Republicans, meanwhile, in NY, remain anesthetized, lacking leadership, urban base, or language.

In this vacuum, the idea of a third way — well-funded, well-connected, aesthetically moderate but rhetorically aggressive — is not just possible. It’s inevitable. Michael Bloomberg built his career along these lines. And perhaps that’s why Musk is moving. Not because he has civic virtues — but because he senses opportunity where ideological collapse has opened space.

Creating an alternative movement might be the lifeline for a city whose cultural elite has already normalized absurdity, offense censorship, banditry as cultural expression, and racial blackmail as a public policy criterion. New York’s left has reached the point of resembling what they claimed to oppose: intolerant, authoritarian, paranoid, and full of social resentment wrapped in academic vocabulary.

If Musk’s — or whoever embraces this project’s — plan succeeds, it won’t be due to brilliance. It will be due to lack of competition. New York is so mired in slogans and identity fanaticism that any rational alternative, even if wrapped in self-promotion, will seem sensible by comparison.

The question isn’t whether a third way can change the election.

It’s why no one tried sooner.

Expand full comment

No posts